differential between the two is partly down to the two litre smaller fuel load ( the SX has a 19-litre tank versus the R ’ s 17-litre version ), less bodywork and a far smaller pillion seat etc . But don ’ t get me wrong , that ’ s not to say the SX can ’ t hustle and wheelie with the best of them . It will . Whatever the case , both machines share basically the same five piece cast alloy frame and running gear . However , the suspension and brakes are completely different and the Z has 1mm less trail at 101mm , which all adds up to create sharp differences to the ride and the type of rider feedback . Ok , so the SX is a sporty tourer and has clearly got softer suspension , a big double-bubble style , three way adjustable screen that ’ s 15mm taller for this year , and it has less intense Nissin brakes . Also , it has provision for integrated panniers to complete the touring package – which are now easier to mount . In true street-fighter style , the R gets powerful Brembo M50 monobloc front calipers and 10mm bigger diameter discs , a nice Ohlins shock with shorter travel and firmer Showa forks . It also has much less body work and no screen . The styling is ‘ Sugomi ’ inspired , apparently , which means an object that gives off an intense aura or energy that can be felt by the viewer ... we say it looks cool in ‘ Kiwi ’ speak . The engines in both bikes produce a hair over 140hp ( 104.5 kW ) at 10,000rpm and 111Nm at 7300rpm from the 1043cc DOHC inline four configuration . They both have four 38mm oval
KIWI RIDER 41