differential between the two is partly down to the two litre smaller fuel load( the SX has a 19-litre tank versus the R’ s 17-litre version), less bodywork and a far smaller pillion seat etc. But don’ t get me wrong, that’ s not to say the SX can’ t hustle and wheelie with the best of them. It will. Whatever the case, both machines share basically the same five piece cast alloy frame and running gear. However, the suspension and brakes are completely different and the Z has 1mm less trail at 101mm, which all adds up to create sharp differences to the ride and the type of rider feedback. Ok, so the SX is a sporty tourer and has clearly got softer suspension, a big double-bubble style, three way adjustable screen that’ s 15mm taller for this year, and it has less intense Nissin brakes. Also, it has provision for integrated panniers to complete the touring package – which are now easier to mount. In true street-fighter style, the R gets powerful Brembo M50 monobloc front calipers and 10mm bigger diameter discs, a nice Ohlins shock with shorter travel and firmer Showa forks. It also has much less body work and no screen. The styling is‘ Sugomi’ inspired, apparently, which means an object that gives off an intense aura or energy that can be felt by the viewer... we say it looks cool in‘ Kiwi’ speak. The engines in both bikes produce a hair over 140hp( 104.5 kW) at 10,000rpm and 111Nm at 7300rpm from the 1043cc DOHC inline four configuration. They both have four 38mm oval
KIWI RIDER 41